From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6EC13888F for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCBB9E0814; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386D5E080D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (aftr-37-201-213-217.unity-media.net [37.201.213.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCFDB340562 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <20150930204510.7e0bd29f.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20151008154237.c5b94b546444d7204ab91a98@gentoo.org> <56166864.2050204@gentoo.org> <9C591B75-DE0D-4AB6-8A6E-89FA178513BF@gentoo.org> <5616855D.8000106@gentoo.org> <20151009042132.662d0925458f8804abcee442@gentoo.org> <56179764.7070902@gentoo.org> <56179BE3.1000708@gentoo.org> <56179DE5.40305@gentoo.org> <5617A264.1010900@gentoo.org> <5617A397.3020400@gentoo.org> <5617AB77.4050302@gentoo.org> From: hasufell X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5617AFD3.2040503@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:15:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5617AB77.4050302@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 80326bf4-bca0-4060-9a22-322d4140a924 X-Archives-Hash: b1dfc8df7416d81ce669f46dfdd8da04 On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part > ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site? It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github. >From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose. > An > example is all the discussion on "The Crystal Programming Language" pull > #105. That discussion should have happened on our bugzilla so we have > that history on our own infra. I don't see why that discussion should have happened on bugzilla. Reviews on bugzilla are painful and broken. And it's not a global matter. I can and will review (new) ebuilds anywhere I please, including private mails from my proxied maintainers (some use that workflow) or mails to project aliases (which are only semi-public), although it's preferred that the information is public. Information on who has reviewed the ebuild are supposed to go into the git merge commit message, so you can always contact the reviewer. > Can we get the gentoo-bot to organize email notifications in such > a way that we can easily search and read histories by issues and/or > pull requests? The gentoo-bot already gets those mail notifications (I guess? can mgorny confirm?), so the data would already be there, just needs to be processed. But that's not something that needs to happen overnight, since there is no data loss imminent.