From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702631384A7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40EB421C012; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34B021C005 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.14.109] (p509919d1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.153.25.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mrueg) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A30E340691 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Manuel_R=c3=bcger?= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <560C4510.70000@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:24:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mMCGjHhml8sNPddbobua1F1ANOF8cduiV" X-Archives-Salt: a9805acb-7ca1-48cd-8baf-3d6f305bf002 X-Archives-Hash: b5b7aa83ddd64fdfa84284c1ceddcec6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mMCGjHhml8sNPddbobua1F1ANOF8cduiV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30.09.2015 16:01, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Dear all, >=20 > the Gentoo Council will meet again on Sunday, October 11 at 19:00 UTC i= n > #gentoo-council on freenode. >=20 > Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to discus= s > or vote on. >=20 > The summary of the last meeting will be uploaded over the next 2-3 days= ; my=20 > apologies for the delay. >=20 > Thanks, > Andreas >=20 I'd like the council to vote on EAPI 4 deprecation. Rationale: As [1] shows, it takes a long time to remove packages using deprecated EAPI versions from the tree. Marking EAPI 4 as deprecated, leaves us with EAPI 5 as the only "modern" EAPI, resulting in a (hopefully) quicker removal of old EAPIs, as developers will consider bumping to the latest EAPI when version/revbumping ebuilds (as repoman will mention the deprecated EAPI). [1] http://www.akhuettel.de/~huettel/plots/eapi.php Cheers, Manuel --mMCGjHhml8sNPddbobua1F1ANOF8cduiV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWDEUVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGNEQyNDdEMTRGNDc0OEQwQTMyQ0MxRjA3 NEQ5Rjc0RUVBQzZBM0IxAAoJEHTZ907qxqOx1coIAKwDU/Cken3o20P8uLxOsPo/ EgFj84zVTiZqFg88RHzKeeybc2PTT4ag1OjG2CRidXUP69StONHdgvsTlNnAuOxg 4BZNdJuk5iNVpj2bCOKYoXUrTcCy4eKm0uaZ6B9uQaFu9/lx7W5OvYYkJ3Qf6YS9 RmoL7E1vIpGB1RuQ03hO/CgG6XGmYNJZ/x8ixWO8HKgidn6cGWhp+HblO3wEIQwP Sj0ZwTtGAWyTOBjWAIy7JuM1NQyyGVeO4DvYG6wZv4m8LYOk4n0eUUT6XwGkxSiR FTEycGWhCyZcbdkF10J8as9GARw4Kts6hFVLNu2Rdd2nj6sjp6dk3KOhEI7bqUU= =egt8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mMCGjHhml8sNPddbobua1F1ANOF8cduiV--