From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C228A158020 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDE11E0391; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1FC5E0391 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5599abfc7af246d575eceb5968ec01c521e138b8.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-39: drop hard requirement of yearly lead elections From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:48:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20221108003113.3719310-1-ajak@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 2e4cbabe-9419-482b-b4f5-54ea01e3f302 X-Archives-Hash: 334f3e73a58db8f13cb9791afc6c55d9 On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 10:01 -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > > I think the rough point behind requiring a periodic elections is to > > give > > people an opportunity to issue secret votes against the current > > lead, > > i.e. without requiring them to publicly oppose the lead.=C2=A0 I'm not > > saying > > this is really necessary in the case of Gentoo, though. >=20 > There's value in that, but prior to me pushing for the Elections team > to run the last base-system lead election, had any project election > actually had a secret ballot? All the elections I've been running were via HeliosVoting, so yes, they had. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny