From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7BA138A6C for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15FF8E0833; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98786E07D4 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p5B3BB62A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.59.182.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70353340BD8 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5527F6D7.7010404@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:14:15 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Status update of Sunrise project? References: <5526CB7F.2050302@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eJlQbnu8f2nM1xwfnsJE3l7rWn2NAUgwT" X-Archives-Salt: 2c98785b-806f-4019-a0b1-5ac2fcf53f29 X-Archives-Hash: 22ceb2a0c9c6483d562ea02f2a559634 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eJlQbnu8f2nM1xwfnsJE3l7rWn2NAUgwT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ben de Groot schrieb: > I know the difference. But the two projects have similar goals: review > user submitted ebuilds, and commit them to an central repo to make > them available to a wider public. I think it would be good to get more > packages from sunrise into the main gentoo repo. >=20 > Are there reasons for some of those packages to be kept out of the main= repo? I think, the main reason is the required amount of developer time needed for that move and the continued maintainence of the moved packages. Sunrise has the advantage, that the packages per dev ratio is higher then for packages proxied in the main tree as the user does all the work (prepare, test, commit and update the ebuilds), the devs do just a review of the ebuild itself during the first commit or for bigger changes, so less time per packages required. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --eJlQbnu8f2nM1xwfnsJE3l7rWn2NAUgwT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iJwEAQEIAAYFAlUn9t0ACgkQG7kqcTWJkGeaJQP/TwcnZZFuw3d3i/V/HeTnTskj M49/mBeSmFuCpsSLdlSBHqRL740SJxS8LASYAEtkSnQGd0xMMw1voITKDgqg0NNH JpBpjcgJCv/KC6TBDwkqCbzTbHrXNbABxRivBP06T1S0dXK/fhFMB9O+BJkAS/Si nRtv6c0/xWZo6dIAyyo= =49ET -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJlQbnu8f2nM1xwfnsJE3l7rWn2NAUgwT--