From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08320138A1A for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81D70E097D; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058ACE0962 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [178.62.26.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E114334084A for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54E007A4.5050504@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:42:44 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract References: <201502142148.30540.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201502142148.30540.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1ed1103b-428d-44dd-b51e-afb09f981257 X-Archives-Hash: 87e26e678ed25f00146c67583b0abd86 Andreas K. Huettel: > > * The Gentoo Social Contract states [1]: > "Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or metadata unless it > conforms to the GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public > License, the Creative Commons - Attribution/Share Alike or some other license > approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI)." > This has already been violated numerous times, including the development of emul-linux-x86-* packages. Not sure why we are so picky about it now.