From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2962A138A1A for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ADD5E0A65; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A2CE0A63 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.144.0.5] (host-37-191-220-247.lynet.no [37.191.220.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04E0434073E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54DFC134.5070300@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:42:12 +0100 From: Kristian Fiskerstrand User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract References: <201502142148.30540.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 430c4b09-bdb0-4677-a1ff-35ee4c8e8b94 X-Archives-Hash: 2c3fd49d8385ac7f8b522953b0896bc4 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/14/2015 10:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: >> >> We need to resolve this discussion somehow, by formulating a >> clear policy. Which is why I'm putting it up here for discussion >> and will ask to add it to the next council meeting agenda. > > I tend to agree with what seems to be the general sentiment. As > long as we still accept patches via bugzilla/etc, then we aren't > "depending" on github. That depends on where the primary repository of the project lies. Whether it is primary on gentoo infra or if GitHub is de-facto primary repository. If the latter it is a problem. - -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU38EwAAoJEP7VAChXwav60ZsIAJb16/W1X0YiVQx5sIb1bvP2 Is7P4+Sp6ZCuXqY0/PjXLua0w+K4sP3uCLRuSOMrfSASGH6K+Wd41sFBkeDrUbyE 9g5vPkVWXM9C92eBmdEPJhDOZ5FmPAeLmSBqLCcXIs5BivBrfZMUXvlyDcHFtvUk FGbcGf9Mjk0c8z5qjlDmtfnu2SBbQZjAaXX4S1+1tkZxzypiPUDkQmG7Yys9clfH TGQ+yhVpp6K4Dq4AbK3rxn55eI80I8nHt6MFM7d7Ql64eaC7FmTJlr9ZozLqmTux mJO1Ne0xnTW7JMncar0gehRWwoqcnYTzqyzbqtHHKA6zpTGLOZ051CKDdXf9vVg= =dOBL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----