Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract

[Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/14/2015 10:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas K. Huettel 
> <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> 
>> We need to resolve this discussion somehow, by formulating a
>> clear policy. Which is why I'm putting it up here for discussion
>> and will ask to add it to the next council meeting agenda.
> 
> I tend to agree with what seems to be the general sentiment.  As
> long as we still accept patches via bugzilla/etc, then we aren't 
> "depending" on github.

That depends on where the primary repository of the project lies.
Whether it is primary on gentoo infra or if GitHub is de-facto primary
repository. If the latter it is a problem.

- -- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU38EwAAoJEP7VAChXwav60ZsIAJb16/W1X0YiVQx5sIb1bvP2
Is7P4+Sp6ZCuXqY0/PjXLua0w+K4sP3uCLRuSOMrfSASGH6K+Wd41sFBkeDrUbyE
9g5vPkVWXM9C92eBmdEPJhDOZ5FmPAeLmSBqLCcXIs5BivBrfZMUXvlyDcHFtvUk
FGbcGf9Mjk0c8z5qjlDmtfnu2SBbQZjAaXX4S1+1tkZxzypiPUDkQmG7Yys9clfH
TGQ+yhVpp6K4Dq4AbK3rxn55eI80I8nHt6MFM7d7Ql64eaC7FmTJlr9ZozLqmTux
mJO1Ne0xnTW7JMncar0gehRWwoqcnYTzqyzbqtHHKA6zpTGLOZ051CKDdXf9vVg=
=dOBL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----