From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476C513877A for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41904E0869; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F58E0867 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-5d6a47-146.dhcp.inet.fi [93.106.71.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17E1C3400C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53DA59C5.2060709@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:59:17 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8f8fa2d0-648d-4c66-8230-3a8eea4130b7 X-Archives-Hash: 9895c9b54de5b27ceb2b4e3a7029b6d9 On 31/07/14 17:40, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time >> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda >> to discuss or vote on. >> >> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to >> repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously >> suggested one (since the last meeting). >> >> The agenda for the next meeting will be sent out on Tuesday 2014-08-05. >> >> Please reply to the gentoo-project list. >> >> Ulrich >> > I am disappointed that the Portage team declined to bring the issue of > disabling dynamic dependencies to the Council's attention themselves. > Thus, I must request the Council to consider the Portage team's recent > decision[1] in this matter. +1 It seems like the Portage team is ignoring multiple developers who have said they either rely upon dynamic deps, or have otherwise raised conserns about the feature removal without replacement in place. The last hope seems to be that the council stops them for deleting the working code (with some races, races we can live with)