From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2451392EF for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 924ACE09CC; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C80E097D for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (mobile-internet-bcee39-235.dhcp.inet.fi [188.238.57.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6596833BE9D for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53C7C344.3050905@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:36:20 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council Elections Results for term 2014-2015 References: <53C7202F.1050404@gentoo.org> <53C72B84.9050605@gentoo.org> <53C7B59A.8090605@gentoo.org> <53C7B852.8070708@gentoo.org> <53C7BE51.3040605@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53C7BE51.3040605@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b122d1d2-6be5-400f-9e95-42ed494e94b7 X-Archives-Hash: 869068ff295668c7a0a28ae13c2ba9a7 On 17/07/14 15:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 07/17/14 07:49, hasufell wrote: >> Dirkjan Ochtman: >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, hasufell wrote: >>>> Doesn't that make the vote invalid? >>> >>> I don't see why it would. Maybe if voters would have known in advance >>> that their votes might be compromised. >>> >> >> IMO, it doesn't matter if the violation had an effect on the result. It >> matters that there was a violation of procedure. >> > > Unfortunately it does have an effect since council members now know > who voted for them and who didn't and this can make for bad feelings, > impartiality etc. I'm not sure how to deal with this since a re-vote > will not make this knowledge go away. While not a perfect solution, > maybe we should just try to ignore it as much as possible? > For what's it worth, I couldn't care less if my voting is public or not, it's nothing personal to anyone, it's only what I think is best for the distribution And I hope others feel the same way (even those whom didn't get elected)