From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABACD1381FA for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A52CE09EB; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9C3E09DB for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.181.53.45] (unknown [85.76.64.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 275E233FB60 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53760661.8020507@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:36:49 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question References: <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org> <536E1FA7.5050704@gentoo.org> <2731252.LOkG5ql5OK@localhost> <536FE7C4.2090403@gentoo.org> <537481BE.1070609@gentoo.org> <5374A32B.9000805@gentoo.org> <53760525.9090300@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53760525.9090300@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 45082e47-9163-4903-84ac-8cc42bff53c6 X-Archives-Hash: 2096b80fa3c4402e3085e814b84e86cd On 16/05/14 15:31, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 15/05/14 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> Sergey Popov: >>>> And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML and >>>> get things done if you can. >>>> >>> This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not >>> interested". >>> >>> Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will work >>> with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA. >> Perhaps you should let QA speak for what it thinks its job is? Note >> that random posts in random bugs by random members of QA isn't the >> same as QA saying something. > Except it is, that's what QA just voted in their own meeting, > one QA member represents the whole team. > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Unclarities_wrt_what_.22QA_team.22_is