From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-3637-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2D41381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C0CE0B5A;
	Fri, 16 May 2014 12:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B4C9E0B55
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.181.53.45] (unknown [85.76.64.65])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ssuominen)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EC8D33FE1D
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:32:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53760525.9090300@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:31:33 +0300
From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question
References: <CAGfcS_n-u9T7xec7YGumsnkMXRRnHWQ2i+3SEha+69veSP--WQ@mail.gmail.com>	<536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org>	<536E1FA7.5050704@gentoo.org>	<2731252.LOkG5ql5OK@localhost>	<536FE7C4.2090403@gentoo.org>	<537481BE.1070609@gentoo.org>	<5374A32B.9000805@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_kcpTLoJEtLCZzfkpWq2WCntA8V6BF7Z6b_3YUgA40Yaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kcpTLoJEtLCZzfkpWq2WCntA8V6BF7Z6b_3YUgA40Yaw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 858108ae-d693-4ec1-ae8f-ac3725f3a4c4
X-Archives-Hash: 73e008728fd1d5f28dbdbb6706634d88


On 15/05/14 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Sergey Popov:
>>> And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML and
>>> get things done if you can.
>>>
>> This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not
>> interested".
>>
>> Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will work
>> with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA.
> Perhaps you should let QA speak for what it thinks its job is?  Note
> that random posts in random bugs by random members of QA isn't the
> same as QA saying something.

Except it is, that's what QA just voted in their own meeting,
one QA member represents the whole team.