From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43841381FA for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFD8CE09F2; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51827E0932 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [46.167.245.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4B8533F8F9 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5374A32B.9000805@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:21:15 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question References: <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org> <536E1FA7.5050704@gentoo.org> <2731252.LOkG5ql5OK@localhost> <536FE7C4.2090403@gentoo.org> <537481BE.1070609@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <537481BE.1070609@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bf953539-6758-4f3a-b2ee-e55a1a53265b X-Archives-Hash: b7e9304731a75151c41c16d488c73597 Sergey Popov: > And yes, we need tinderbox. But, c'mon. stop talking loudly on ML and > get things done if you can. > This is like working on patches while upstream already said "not interested". Since QA doesn't think it's their job to run a tinderbox, I will work with those people who actually care about it, instead of QA.