From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-3600-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3BA1381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAE59E0A6C;
	Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29384E0A65
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (unknown [96.47.226.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A1B733FA4C
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <536FE166.80706@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 20:45:26 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014
References: <CAGfcS_n-u9T7xec7YGumsnkMXRRnHWQ2i+3SEha+69veSP--WQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGfcS_nc5DRqy5urW9WjqgD2EKvmc5Ls7Pee2h4Z73xpnx0Q9Q@mail.gmail.com>	<536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org>	<20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org>	<536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org>	<536D183A.1020405@gentoo.org>	<CAGfcS_nDhAtE8Xw24NPwJeZyZ7rH3iB0VETHVBP+bvU-6T2iyg@mail.gmail.com>	<536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org>	<20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org>	<536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org>	<536E1FA7.5050704@gentoo.org>	<CAGfcS_=LPHpC_JTN4o9deaKJ2xfOwWLDoT4XZmpNtn8o2F75vw@mail.gmail.com>	<536E2CE8.1070807@gentoo.org> <21358.13865.480714.699573@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <536FE028.2080402@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <536FE028.2080402@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c5a18f46-120a-4651-8811-20f3f322297b
X-Archives-Hash: 50c89f41dfbe2d89f725303705aa8bdd

hasufell:
> Ulrich Mueller:
>>>>>>> hasufell wrote:
>>
>>> [...] QA team is not helpful [...] and seems to not care much [...]
>>> [...] I have problems believing in QA competence [...]
>>> [...] I have serious doubts about their technical understanding [...]
>>> [...] lolwat? [...]
>>> [...] I can't even take their comments seriously. [...]
>>> [...] the new and the old team. It hasn't improved [...]
>>
>> All posted to this list in the last two days. Do you really wonder why
>> you don't get any answers from QA team members any more?
>>
> 
> That doesn't make sense. You are saying you didn't reply, because you
> knew I would eventually post this on the project ML?
> 
> Some people stressed it way too much, so I came up with this. I
> repeatedly contacted people in private as well, before I decided to
> escalate.
> 
> So, no... I'm not hiding somewhere and waiting for my chance to piss
> people off.
> I tried for months to get help from QA. Most of the time, it didn't work
> out very well (enough examples given already, would be interesting if
> someone actually replies to them). This is not on me.
> 

Besides, I am not a fan of escalating on ML-level. I usually try this on
a) private mail or b) mail-alias level.

And I did so several times. It isn't really fun for me, because it
causes negativity and makes it actually harder to get constructive results.

But, here we are.