From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-3548-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2F31381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 18:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5F4AE0995;
	Fri,  9 May 2014 18:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E5E6E0982
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 18:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.187.243.203] (unknown [85.76.145.159])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: ssuominen)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00AAF33ECD6
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 18:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:45:05 +0300
From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014
References: <CAGfcS_n-u9T7xec7YGumsnkMXRRnHWQ2i+3SEha+69veSP--WQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGfcS_nc5DRqy5urW9WjqgD2EKvmc5Ls7Pee2h4Z73xpnx0Q9Q@mail.gmail.com>	<536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org>	<20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org>	<536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org>	<536D183A.1020405@gentoo.org>	<CAGfcS_nDhAtE8Xw24NPwJeZyZ7rH3iB0VETHVBP+bvU-6T2iyg@mail.gmail.com>	<536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org> <20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4447bb30-5a1b-4065-a986-c2543832b819
X-Archives-Hash: ca9c8b59c63149d77e5d39183813d2a6


On 09/05/14 21:37, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of
>> each package to determine it for himself, no global USE="gtk"
>> possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use.
> So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no results.
>

I'm not so sure, it seems QA is picking policies as per what some loud
people on the ML say as opposed to giving overwhelming technical arguments
their proper weight

I hope I'm wrong

- Samuli