From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49D1381FA for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75274E0966; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B34E0960 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.187.243.203] (unknown [85.76.145.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A687E33FD3F for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <536D19F9.0@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:10:01 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 References: <536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org> <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 18371832-dc37-4ccc-8c7d-b205937d68fc X-Archives-Hash: f1479a2fc114f8f27de5a56050054fa8 On 09/05/14 18:29, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Fri, 09 May 2014 14:07:46 +0000 > hasufell wrote: > >> I ask the council to vote on banning pkg-config files that would be >> added or renamed downstream (at least this will prevent new >> violations). > I ask them to consider to allow gentoo-*.pc files as an exception. That's no good, because then when you fix reverse dependencies to use gentoo-*.pc, and then upstream accepts the *.pc, you'll have to refix all of the packages all over again Using foobar.pc directly is perfectly fine, long as there is an effort to upstreamize it - Samuli