From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30521387FD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCF21E0A84; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FAEE0A7F for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (pool-108-39-152-11.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [108.39.152.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F28B133FEA6 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5341B2E5.5010402@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:02:45 -0400 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 References: <53342A5F.70903@gentoo.org> <201404061435.00789.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <53414CD2.4030100@gentoo.org> <53416E80.40605@gentoo.org> <534172D6.6040204@gentoo.org> <20140406181722.615ab6f4@gentoo.org> <53418884.2070000@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53418884.2070000@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 729ab566-23e9-4e09-b41f-7c77858e3af4 X-Archives-Hash: d66299c7ab6736bf4aad3eab9a2af3c3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/06/2014 01:01 PM, hasufell wrote: > Tom Wijsman: >>> Is this what I can expect from sticking around in Gentoo? > >> When people (yes, multiple) resort to reverting commits and/or >> filing ComRel bugs instead of appropriate discussion and escalation >> ... yes. > > > No, this does not conform with CoC. QA members don't have a special > right to be insulting on a non-technical level, even if people don't > follow their policies. > > I am used to rude/blunt language and often prefer it over other > forms... but there is a line when it becomes random abusive language. > > I'm not going to challenge what is a CoC violation vs what isn't, but I'd like it to be clear that no one should consider themselves above conforming to the CoC, ever, for any reason. Not QA, not me, not any member of the community, developer or otherwise. If someone needs to be smacked down for being a d-bag now and again (very possibly me) then it would be a good life lesson. Thanks, Zero -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTQbLlAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKBBMP/iiXRDapVMJYru1wwRsKgIiO MJp91SP5TaeouIS3CWxbSxR4feAmHbCXIZ8j8xCu1k09CO4fSb0pCFuoQ/baDEHF OuMSax5WzJy2+KsSIoXZwoK7Csx3OisfT1x61xZ5eAs9FetRT3H50RNMmC9w9Y67 WzQzm8v5iZp/Tcz6Fg2/MWtdAiYoAyUkvnmFPWBQzQRsDtGJixe/N+Y+jLtUdmSE zCnnse1Y1MZTbHJqbuyjMdqYIyeDf4OroQ4U3rUjlYB14oQfjkhf06jM/rxR/tM2 LstUOxiRE6o0l30feiXpZs8vMMAwkXDx/H+DhoyCyzgSgTR75ztyujC6iSeB9zul IPRqH3wxiRmcSshFq2mi7REXMHIAt6dW9e40FN2H6LA1/FKTahQXXmQg5RC57MXI CYNh8aIVyLNbGdz3QWRCfFQkRgqPgA5RH5tjZWxOm4wtnyzrwdxejGToCwlN1p3Q hssKZmubdo7i/HvhcvBx8k27Q4HSWPW6+VA3/wfxEojb3nqA1+N4rfkhAbsIJjxd GbtSAe9y+PQRB+qKJRoyS5LenWZvH77d4htGRDceC65MYSFVXiVpcC7FUax7TVV0 SZGAfCcxoxyRcHyLHQVK9atD6UPlyLQl/h416jw92FuX0R2N4Y/V1bOA+cFmHOVV xdPE/j2TXbsCJygjerla =RX5v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----