From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416F91387FD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 450C4E0A59; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC9FE09FF for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20BF233FE6D for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <534172D6.6040204@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:29:26 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 References: <53342A5F.70903@gentoo.org> <201404061435.00789.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <53414CD2.4030100@gentoo.org> <53416E80.40605@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53416E80.40605@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ad110234-cfc1-4ba9-9bf5-21754b6d1a30 X-Archives-Hash: f5b23e21f3cb869c9916f422d69a841f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I generally don't speak up when people are flaming. I've followed this mailing list and been involved with Gentoo for far too long. I.e. I have become defeatist about the attitudes of certain developers. On 06/04/14 17:10, Samuli Suominen wrote: > 21:37 <@Zero_Chaos> floppym: honestly there are a few "senior" > gentoo developers which could be shot in the head for all I care. However -- despite how jaded I have become with all the flaming, and despite how little attention I pay it these days -- I can't help but be disappointed that someone not only associated with Gentoo, but in such a position as Zero_Chaos is in, is allowed to make such statements. Is this what I can expect from sticking around in Gentoo? - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlNBctYACgkQRtClrXBQc7W13wEApJUYDsg8nDBHiasdddCHFFrS dALPNgdQtMveXypU3swA/A+rQIVbI0UjOWJipFTqYPm82xxBYr0NgNWD42dXmi6v =cQNc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----