From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECF71387FD for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BE8E0A40; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B388E080D for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (tor-exit.xshells.net [178.217.187.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 348F233EECB for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5336CA1F.1060008@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:26:55 +0000 From: hasufell Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 References: <53342A5F.70903@gentoo.org> <5336C19C.7020608@opensource.dyc.edu> In-Reply-To: <5336C19C.7020608@opensource.dyc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8569499d-7e5f-4d04-a185-0e617f3d10cc X-Archives-Hash: fd1508a3500d4f77bc976ac325859810 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Anthony G. Basile: > On 03/27/2014 09:40 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The council will be meeing on April 8, 2014 at 1900 UTC. Please >> bring forward any agenda items you would like discussed. >> >> --Tony >> > > Okay I'd like to add an agenda item. A policy inspired by bug > #506034. > > Motion: "Significant changes to virtuals are to be discussed (via > mailing list or bugzilla) with all the maintainers and/or herds > which maintain packages those virtuals depend on." > > Discussion: "Like eclasses, changes to virtuals can affect all the > packages which depend on them. Changing existing virtuals, > removing virtuals or adding new ones affect the packages they > depend on. When such a change is proposed, all maintainers > affected need to be included in the discussion." > Sounds like any other reverse-dep. If people don't discuss non-trivial changes (to whatever part of gentoo), then that needs to be fixed, not policies introduced for every single situation that arises. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTNsofXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzMDlCNDQ4NjEyNDI4NjA5REVEMDI3MzIy MjBDRDFDNUJERUVEMDIwAAoJECIM0cW97tAgg08QAJz2ZGqjsFxIctK6u1LcMmtN 5jIP7xorHZYFOyWLwHOSzjGakoZj5qbhm2c3BoWh26qtmPOEWXoEEbbTpiyHznyZ FcoyRhtAV6n7pXqC3Wqkb30gmL2fkxDYpx/8uFzmFAH6Jemhz5usgc82MKTpCznU 91OuSWeVKx0HNNF5jCWBRI7AK8NK+Z1zux/qWyI5ftXl4in4UV8fkJcQFJ/MMzqc r6GjCEFrr9houf5YBDk2FNBtctVFj0cLxbrgeTyffQbR+TWng2pBW9HohOkSp3ec XrBumk2LrcBduEfC7ZDZf5B9rsFuN3JlBQd7KsprO7acshoXdTFpjhGxC8BPBF0p 9p8dOp6wWDafZprUT5CW2HD1EiuMxSLTEn4bszyvgRzdA90yOkUBGagXTSeasdnl B8T5dpjx4/idA14DnCI8Dd6Zt639qYG7waPpsRZpJdrX/KKHDagtEE1ouk+rJL/W jSKQyHJWzyE1UUYmVF0JAH+PiOBYIF1RW+LXZoKGvKi05poY2hruA5sQxZ3JUNR6 6QMnsB6+If9yKe+Q6oSrk/UpFJSJUlHt509sfXYhGmnHCQ2G2ZVZ5/tT15MhimoM HIf8NU7F55cwQQT/3nBzv3XNw1VRgvg5Y7PR3BARAEPAcdgSQ87HCbWBU1zNzgXM xC5lVxSwUEGUShgRF5n8 =5FI0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----