From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AB813873B for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7A02E0ACF; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BFCCE0AB1 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.195] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53B2233F4B3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5314E078.7030906@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:05:12 -0500 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 References: <530F38CB.4090608@gentoo.org> <21268.25605.912759.955368@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140303204351.71d86dfc@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <20140303204351.71d86dfc@pomiot.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 616192cd-2c69-4d28-a4d9-2e1b400e56ce X-Archives-Hash: 9dfed8b769472f4c94d8215d347eafba -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/03/14 02:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 12:14:13 Ulrich Mueller > napisał(a): > >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Anthony G Basile wrote: >> >>> I'm putting the call out there for any agenda items for the >>> next Council meeting, which will be held on March 11, 2014 at >>> 1900 UTC. This is short notice but we got off track because of >>> FOSDEM and we're going to try to get back on track. >> >> In February we have voted to "ban new EAPI 1 and 2 ebuilds". Now >> I've seen some commits where ebuilds were changed in place from >> EAPI 0 to EAPI 1. >> >> Can we clarify that the ban includes updating the EAPI in >> existing ebuilds? > > So how we are supposed to handle updating rev-deps to use proper > slot? Convert ancient versions to a new EAPI or just drop them > completely? > That's up to you, as maintainer, isn't it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlMU4HgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAVOgEAk+b6FA2990/5Z1zzxmSYSXWF N6OM6hHFlSRU9YJHFIoA+wS+mlB8HC+suUknx3+mQze7SM2GMxfqIJaUjSyHiud+ =StYV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----