public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:46:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B775E.3000006@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221034746.GF8819@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net>

Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> Funny how every time a controversial decision gets made, somebody
> inevitably tries to undermine the authority of the group making the
>  decision.
>
> In my understanding, the issue you want to address is whether the
> QA team has authority over tree policy.
>
> Will add to the agenda.

Thanks, I would like to phrase the question a little more precisely:

I would like to ask council to state whether the QA team has the
authority to mandate a policy when there is neither general agreement
that this policy is a good thing, nor the policy would avert any kind
of immediate serious problem for users.

> I happen to disagree. GLEP 48's point about maintaining "QA
> Standards" applies to this.

"QA Standards" are not really defined in GLEP 48 either. Maybe council
could also clarify whether "QA Standard" is just another name for
"tree policy".


Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn




  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-24 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-10 14:45 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 Andreas K. Huettel
2014-02-10 15:39 ` Ulrich Mueller
2014-02-10 16:00   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-02-10 16:22     ` Ruud Koolen
2014-02-10 18:03       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 18:49         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-02-10 18:51         ` Ulrich Mueller
2014-02-10 19:07 ` hasufell
2014-02-11  2:39   ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2014-02-11 23:20     ` hasufell
2014-02-20  9:33   ` Ulrich Mueller
2014-02-20 15:46     ` hasufell
2014-02-11 19:46 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-02-13  4:35   ` William Hubbs
2014-02-13 11:41     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-02-21  3:28       ` Donnie Berkholz
2014-02-21  0:14 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2014-02-21  3:47   ` Donnie Berkholz
2014-02-21  4:03     ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-21  4:04       ` Donnie Berkholz
2014-02-21 13:32         ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-02-21  8:38     ` Michał Górny
2014-02-21 10:34       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-24 16:46     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn [this message]
2014-02-24 18:59       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-24 21:43         ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2014-02-24 23:55           ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-25  0:12           ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-24 23:13       ` Patrick Lauer
2014-02-24 23:54 ` Patrick Lauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=530B775E.3000006@gentoo.org \
    --to=chithanh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox