From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB783138CE3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A74DE0CAC; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80FAE0CA9 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-5d821f7c.pool.mediaWays.net [93.130.31.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F44233F386 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52F92363.40300@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:07:15 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 References: <201402101545.39578.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201402101545.39578.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 40818208-5263-454c-847a-3639bebee5be X-Archives-Hash: 4189c2805df5d8d661334de01ad0c870 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As discussed on gentoo-dev ML and recently with the QA team, we have no clear rule/policy about 'gtk' USE flags. Currently there are all kinds of them: gtk, gtk2, gtk3. That looks inconsistent to me. The council should decide whether to allow: * gtk only * gtk2, gtk3, ..., but without 'gtk' mixing these two concepts is confusing from a usability POV. I have no strong opinion on what to do. But we should not do both. links: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/255125 http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/gentoo-dev-gtk2-gtk3-use-flags-help-212168702.html https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+SNjAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSWIIAKMV/9olwc4EKkag+QyByT/4 SHx08y4Ul/3DeZtxNykvFQ2ZgItlnxRZJaTkrbM0ZMs2/8u20ZtW3rV1S3B0Nte1 HDZicsmE33X+iRHObErBp+MJvbqBRJvQynEtPSzAWb5lWdN5fjp4v6DZKUPplXYn id8VSqDxK5y0v33uY0R+GWsOyUyIulp7FWDI2aKKOIaa24fOGIqQf7Npob7D8Q9w FDwabtmbiUHL4rF2Qvy3KlvHUhv8ChDVZHBEYov+4mnJl0y+E6gwGvQICz3woYgk hJRgzRO3FdIQqWkgRYrA67F95iaEKjaEeIrPh8IWgNq26kjBpJ1GK6BaR7F89S0= =Vlmi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----