From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D781381F3 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E97EE0AC2; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF41E0ABE for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1E4933DA38 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <521CFE54.60301@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:30:28 -0400 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130823 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote References: <20130817222025.GA15851@linux1> <1377630676.2891.0@NeddySeagoon_SSD> In-Reply-To: <1377630676.2891.0@NeddySeagoon_SSD> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ee79d969-ac86-4734-8a70-26c917187e95 X-Archives-Hash: c6b8b16cad0e603a59a509afa596dd56 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 27/08/13 03:11 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2013.08.17 23:20, William Hubbs wrote: >> Council members, >> >> After looking over the documentation I know about [1] [2] [3], I >> think it is safe to Say we are prepared to move forward with >> stating that the preparations for early boot mechanisms are >> complete. > > [snip] > >> Thanks, >> >> William >> >> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/initramfs-guide.xml [2] >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2- >> quickinstall.xml [3] >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting [4] >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481202 >> > > William, > > If such a vote were to go in your favour, what are the next steps > and the timescale(s) for these steps? > > You clearly perceive the vote you seek as endorsing a plan of > action relating to the /usr merge. > > My apologies in advance if I have missed these details. > > Also #4 is still blocked, that to me would seem that we are not ready. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlIc/lQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBDfgD/WCiLFNWFyS8aWZ963/FtKlxL SmsyE7YcorfDTIL7C0sA+wURmTE1LV337zrEl50crDixe5rWbguwKMqLtxpKnHY4 =oAx3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----