From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43C41381F3 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18067E0A53; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C09E09F0 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4db0f310.pool.mediaWays.net [77.176.243.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60F3033E1C2 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51F18EE0.5050502@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:47:28 +0200 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130630 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage References: <51F16EF7.30606@gentoo.org> <1374778562.4925.9.camel@localhost> <1374779261.4925.16.camel@localhost> <51F17997.6070100@gentoo.org> <1374780632.4925.22.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1374780632.4925.22.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a2c2bcde-551b-4f6b-85af-23f0e8462bc0 X-Archives-Hash: 2c80fe416c20647f67747b85154ea414 On 07/25/2013 09:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 21:16 +0200, hasufell escribió: > [...] >> It's mainly about consistency with our social contract and will make >> people aware that gentoo by default blocks non-free software, because >> every user who wants more than that, will have to edit make.conf. > > But do we really give the impression "Gentoo *blocks* non-free > software" No, that is just wrong. People who are not able to read the gentoo handbook will fail to install and use it. Thas has always been a fact. Those who read the handbook will also come across the license section, which explains the situation.