From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2620-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F34E1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 959B7E0998;
	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f48.google.com (mail-bk0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EC5E0991
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id jf17so1363319bkc.21
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=FWw4AjbN2wRtklkWpNQm0QFU6j/Gb0xMbK5Zc6NeLoc=;
        b=C5/35kKXxujd9w83lGEcCiFScyelXCAxtwJCX4sFVmQrezZsfOKxyOm9J/hlXA0k/S
         lMUfhn9CsKPphF88yQ49uQl2EY5rXe2chfngPbg9K8WVJrr6GutGaV0uUpB9/HdtRVUF
         JkyZZGELki/9RSHZkk5g6vigTPMUsWm6UpTmOmH5DNJsR2QyOU4XOrboSYPi2heYgjzi
         dC6OzlvKE7a6NBi76+bGqefnfjBmlzGihV9OyY7m0Oao/gBAB85ZXOL7tSpdqBn9ven8
         XwD9oqqu2p1jQNjNYO63/cjmeo+KT4xiR5mFCK/pED4JGseEiRqDzNoapp0PM4VH7QsY
         aWkg==
X-Received: by 10.205.37.16 with SMTP id tc16mr2136316bkb.100.1371495057261;
        Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.18] ([5.157.117.94])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fc7sm4658875bkc.3.2013.06.17.11.50.55
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51BF59D0.1020901@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:47:44 +0200
From: "vivo75@gmail.com" <vivo75@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130610 Thunderbird/17.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
CC: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
References: <CAGfcS_mLUy+YPG+Fkgbm4w_4h7iWgD=i6KEG-c158MBfX+xJdA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+NrkpfMdfokw4AQ7-AvoHRXeUPDS8OYV8e_=2ioqyibuy1Prg@mail.gmail.com> <1371039602.27198.24.camel@localhost> <CAGfcS_mtQcfuBT_-Hww5m=eZKrTULqcDT1a47pnkbv=XtqVsBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO-1Pb5A6FfLpN9bZPTwt2dPxuJUh1=RsO9CLdikMDMhciF9yg@mail.gmail.com> <20130612162535.570c2bc0@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nR4jTawX0eU5TqCwOVPfQ+zJW-=2Mg9=6A0KmmnHy+ww@mail.gmail.com> <CAB9SyzTMxfu7Kys3kCCr1ZmbE_12wDm=L2UWwZhrz63Jr6sq+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAGfcS_=iA_GZrp6jmo+vkDd5MVsZzArPBBMPjLkf6BJ8SL_MbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB9SyzTaL0+DX-fR3f+-HTkXfBZ98o4BpHMBMCxJmuXN7eJpYA@mail.gmail.com> <20130614173413.28dd8e8b@gentoo.org> <51BB825D.1080907@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <51BB825D.1080907@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 3c14cf2b-efe6-4488-ae3e-b6f420b8e968
X-Archives-Hash: 5155ef314ca9382886d75346955c8c53

On 06/14/13 22:51, hasufell wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 05:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2013-06-14, o godz. 21:09:08 Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
> > napisał(a):
>
> >> On 13 June 2013 11:12, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>> Maintainers MAINTAIN packages, they don't own them.  They're
> >>> expected to cooperate with other projects, and if they're going
> >>> to point at the rules to justify blocking work others are doing
> >>> they shouldn't be surprised if others find rules to point at as
> >>> well.
> >>
> >> Cooperation doesn't include hostile take-over.
>
> > Hostile take-over? This is really getting *ridiculous*.
>
>
> I perceive this as trolling.
>
ridiculous, no really, that's even too few