public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:31:23 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BD5BBB.9060201@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306151415.01134.dilfridge@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1574 bytes --]

15.06.2013 16:15, Andreas K. Huettel пишет:
> Well, we have debated about everything to death, and independent of the 
> technical details and of the issue at hand it always boils down to the same 
> non-technical points:
> 
> * Do you see yourself as "maintainer of package X", or do you see yourself as 
> "maintainer of package X which is a part of Gentoo"?

Of course, "maintainer of package X which is a part of Gentoo". Cause we
maintain packages FOR a distribution. So we should cooperative if we
want to reach this goal.

> * How many compromises are you willing to accept to provide the best user 
> experience?

If things does not make maintaince process much harder - they are all
accepted.

> * How many compromises are you willing to accept to help your colleague 
> developers?

If developer(or user, it is not the point in this case) clearly explains
why this change is needed and provives good examples, where absence of
this change will be bad for our users(we work for users, first of all),
i see no problem in this change.

Of course, we should mention here 'dirty hack->workaround->proper
solution' stream, but i will skip it for now.

> In my personal opinion, it's worthwhile to cooperate and put effort into 
> Gentoo to improve the distribution as a whole. It is NOT worthwhile to focus 
> on isolated solutions, refuse to cooperate with others, and waste energy on 
> turf wars.

+1 for that.

-- 
Best regards, Sergey Popov
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead
Gentoo Qt project lead


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 555 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-16  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-15 11:50 [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 11:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2013-06-15 12:15   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 21:43     ` Michael Weber
2013-06-16  4:20     ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16  6:31     ` Sergey Popov [this message]
2013-06-16  9:33       ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-15 12:08 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-15 12:42   ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 13:44     ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 14:19       ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 16:08         ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 13:30 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-15 16:08   ` Roy Bamford
2013-06-15 20:00     ` William Hubbs
2013-06-15 20:14       ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-17 16:15 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-06-17 17:02   ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-06-17 18:24     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51BD5BBB.9060201@gentoo.org \
    --to=pinkbyte@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox