From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA53138010 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B973E21C0EA for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD6421C0E4 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wireless-86-50-146-214.open.aalto.fi (wireless-86-50-146-214.open.aalto.fi [86.50.146.214]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C0633A614 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5092689D.1050702@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:18:37 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petteri_R=E4ty?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] proposal for reducing of cross-posting References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9F29BF9B29E8654C956FB8E0" X-Archives-Salt: 9944ab42-cc3a-400e-aad9-1046c86f5de9 X-Archives-Hash: 373e164e417ba3ba42f7284cad104cb8 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9F29BF9B29E8654C956FB8E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30.10.2012 17.41, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I would like to propose the two following things: > 1) to stop cross-posting between gentoo-dev and gentoo-dev-announce. > gentoo-dev-announce has reply-to gentoo-dev, I see no reason for > cross-posting. > 2) to stop cross-posting for council announcements between > gentoo-dev-announce and gentoo-project, and instead to post them only > in gentoo-dev-announce and not use gentoo-project for council at all, > because they are mails regarding technical issues, while > gentoo-project is a list decidated to non-technical discussions. > Opinions? >=20 1) I get my email in separate folders for the two so it's nice to have the full thread in each folder 2) The current rule already is that the actual technical discussion is on gentoo-dev and gentoo-project is just for submitting the agenda. Granted this is not the simplest rule. I think you already decided to solve a good problem if some things are posted to many non announce mailing lists so thanks for that. Regards, Petteri --------------enig9F29BF9B29E8654C956FB8E0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQkmigAAoJEPeUsk245OzwWwwP/AqFL13s9UEQIv8F/J8HS2Kb G7YF5OCNO6DpFyWAQVwo1amdTn71K3cly/Gve7Iezv14XXo9VzpHV7VIsxS4bVVo 2oCNFf658lRGtNxJnafsQ1nSeOvns5Z78FSTHT4w8zALR+91WLhMXLPZB7AOdPe1 DLxc65lEz1gjRhG8NwtBTGPLNaq4+9w0om5Wdfn35DCcYw65HduTrDgvnq0IgRVl ocgfCfAjSwncab+iS4lPp7P85gJiUwYryADEYc4kFiEfu/PmIFJbflOUX2CtIQuH X7DXY9dtv3qKPXbhhDyILf/+9v/yEIIhSpu8YnpCAgopcp/IxfFTxsb/Np4VN9Tu SDfGx4pAI5Y6L4zZbsPm7t/7FmYXkdJvR6HOtQDQuF0qKqFWtQZUZ9T2NlkKDjP1 oyA5VFMzJdklXsPaeQHXQj3LdYvV8lg/+BNL7VTtpXLsuPZHhaaLHrWx8xfZ390J agbZk1HL/TerBbJNdexsNkEDtd0NqP/VCHnVUfCQVIuxsv6PK+KVYRMk5wmtWD2i WckWucnDar4QUr3nIXldPmpVB93pdNVGJ6V0hNCdkhmi3wOrZ7sissNcTAxbxjZB cBsFVK7B34xUq5Rl7xIbSTauDjN2qpDLzqbrTzW0b9sdl4X/KZrvE+kZD4af4XSw /EIdnlH2C0i2XnC8AV/r =G26A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9F29BF9B29E8654C956FB8E0--