From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D86113832E for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A06A21C08D; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C98A21C08C for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F449340A38 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-08-14 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <2e11e445-c25b-b7f2-def1-99aed92308b6@gentoo.org> <20160804162443.GA7048@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <2d04cd6e-8f20-0944-0f3f-cc54bcab3a01@gentoo.org> <20160805191946.79d6e91c.mgorny@gentoo.org> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: <4c9edb2d-48b7-1d3f-8250-3b15cf688a66@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:21:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160805191946.79d6e91c.mgorny@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d41d9e52-f448-4ea0-a393-f79ec9ff9e5e X-Archives-Hash: 9b6e14e14206f646d30938ae5954c953 On 08/05/2016 01:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Wouldn't the revbump actually cause the PM to ignore the new version > and keep to the incorrectly licensed one? > Only if the existing ebuild was stable, and the user is running a stable system... which is the entire reason I proposed the exception in the first place =P