From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNYfv-0001eB-8Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:04:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8254E062B for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D16E05EB for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so95027ghb.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WzTInJl4x4CqgS1SniG4YEQmS/VG/ZRescwAUOpd368=; b=G86pm92/2cHW5a0QmkzVx0o5iThWc1g2h8wj0k46728IPQfzuJYHUzUZcwhUMOT1qt pjsdH61A+IHJCGBBkf7S1lu73d6pCwHcNrBgiD40L7BeoxVJpCzjp1xedD62f6+Wgj7E ZgkaXsRS765Mn7VCYTbUJV1+hbhHFE+EK17zkpEYU2vqVYIau4Mu23v6ACH9bXPqP6FR C40fTrXpTO1GGDj+0vJZVWEROGqQmbY25+kW/H5kTJ28xccPj3pE6drVPOOs2yEqj+A8 8PmBiXB3qGdJGqoH388CFLWXWH1BHhDcv6o92eXpZ2wTawBBjlmEespAErhWkfPicY5w wqNw== Received: by 10.236.78.2 with SMTP id f2mr8314052yhe.118.1335478862381; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-93-164.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.93.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k8sm3199473anl.12.2012.04.26.15.21.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F99CA4B.6000401@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:20:59 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120418 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-05-08 References: <20120424182141.GQ10282@gentoo.org> <20120424195622.GA6572@linux1> <4F97212D.4050407@gentoo.org> <20120424222600.GA7074@linux1> <1335465934.3059.0@NeddySeagoon> In-Reply-To: <1335465934.3059.0@NeddySeagoon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ea674fd0-ce79-4d65-b205-a1071fa95867 X-Archives-Hash: b2d361a825f023880c9e31506f36022d Roy Bamford wrote: > Council involvement is only useful where there is a choice to be made > between alternatives and the proponents of the options can't agree. > In the udev case, there is as yet, no viable alternative, so the option > is take it or leave it. > > Gentoo may wish to support separate /usr without an initrd but until > the code base allows it, there is nothing for the council to vote on. What did they vote on during the last meeting then? Just curious. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"