From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJAdo-0000qM-15 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:04:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78DE821C0B3; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1333921C094; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (e178073180.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.73.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chithanh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EED241B401F; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA875AB.6000404@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:03:39 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2jDrS1UaGFuaCBDaHJpc3RvcGhlciBOZ3V54buFbg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110827 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> <20111026163724.GB843@gentoo.org> <20111026184927.255ed3bb@pomiocik.lan> <20111026170607.GF843@gentoo.org> <20111026191124.411c1f00@pomiocik.lan> <20111026171554.GG843@gentoo.org> <1319652305.5300.7.camel@belkin4> <20111026205843.GH843@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20111026205843.GH843@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 811bd005033f26940c9bb7314c42a816 Fabian Groffen schrieb: > You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why. > That's the idea of the ChangeLog file. One of the arguments for logging everything in ChangeLog was that extracting this kind information from CVS can be cumbersome. So, I would not agree with "typically". Best regards, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n