From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qo1Zk-0007VB-3g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:07:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1404221C0E1; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005DA21C0C0 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.68] (bl12-236-47.dsl.telepac.pt [85.245.236.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jmbsvicetto) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28AC31B402B for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E37317A.80208@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:06:34 +0000 From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110711 Thunderbird/5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: reopening gentoo-council References: <20110729175513.GA20656@gentoo.org> <20021.34809.183259.704704@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4E370FE5.80102@gentoo.org> <20023.5194.711313.587404@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <20023.5194.711313.587404@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e48891f950c3c0bc730b8d42540980fa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 01-08-2011 21:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: >=20 >> Your rational is a bit off or can be understood incorrectly in how=20 >> the current rules go. Discussion should happen on the on topic=20 >> mailing list (most of the time gentoo-dev or gentoo-project).=20 >> gentoo-project is only used to submit threads to the agenda=20 >> regardless of where the discussion happens. gentoo-dev-announce >> can be used to draw attention to important things. How do you >> propose people decide if something is gentoo-council material or do >> we go back to the situation where threads get fragmented to >> multiple mailing lists? If actual discussion happens elsewhere >> than gentoo-council then I don't think we need a separate mailing >> list just for handling agendas etc. Finally I think gentoo-project >> / gentoo-dev reach a wider audencience but we should get verified=20 >> numbers from infra. >=20 > gentoo-dev, -project, -dev-announce ... this would mean that we > split discussions between three mailing lists at least. (Probably > more, for example PMS/EAPI related stuff should be discussed on > gentoo-pms then.) >=20 > That's too complicated for my simple mind. Unfortunately you can't prevent it. You won't be able to force people to use gentoo-council to discuss any technical issues that have always been discussed on the gentoo-dev ml because it's simpler for the council membe= rs. > Ulrich >=20 - --=20 Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJONzF6AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPDEsP/0+mSJw5dHW2XT6f0NHgOWc6 7BaH5k0SIVkLnXc7TOHRnj7Z5xZxmoYhRJv82skgI3E0BlvumDwmVCaqwRTpY3OD JBimarj/FVD0zN6s49UpUxcOIG4B2mRC6pVtvyBQMAobqWq+tv7cX9yO7NN/CJGQ 1xFVgyL4BbTkbU2GgZwgMgZMv4N/yCcws6XiTGWbEbNFi2vs03UAhCkKCeAC+IXR 0cn/nxzMb75qS/AZoM+VasS0zq6YMJudDFcDS0pYscnlTJIi56AyvMf1KduUJcyf +ubCcdlzjsJAj1yJzuhby5VDG5tNfLFajLbknY0J6ktPxEzluCiu5l4ZdlJAz6vH Q00gRkEKYj2dsXXvadZsWLyGzsstZ3EnVBz/1IgV2HWniDvTyOPEyy4NPQpLxTKh DjbDcxZT4WG2nRMnYgFSmDbVu3ImblxgOkOToAhZUWFfNXtyIZIBoMKeaVTTnCaU 0sLiqTitn6q7loyaVzU4oyolmKW1ytEdaCYDwA2sG1KPMIoPEuPZSOkupsqEDs68 eDFZ8nRx4u0+oA57jZlnklMrv0NiMO4DfBfWrfhC02gyjO7uIYf/teyb1bJhaTM1 r/JO3Me2Ow3dHofyvmRUBve/0Pzl8YSiBHzMN1ZUX9jl9GXG7PKSAqu31OwNlFWF See9M/j6pAIE9RbG1Jym =3DKtRh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----