From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5LtE-0003Jt-LO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:29:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B145E04F6; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D84E04F6 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so970046ugc.49 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:28:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rYDoHNrirY38f7ZF+odojd+ota90DOYM9IjNLTDV5a4=; b=jqhE2Z4e14QJelpfIWyeMWlEsoolXDP1237oni1cnK2cpvmC12AseO1Gjl19776viU GU7yNgl7Zn4xpWxoh+1Mx3gmjAuUSwkaMqZkmsQZrF0BA/T/b7gieXSJtFLHm0s59V5O ONWQ0GApNp0jeCZHMUm2eCdcu+PQB9yafYUoY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H1amBUl2j0UJJYAxc3Orq/swznNUy4uQH185jx0hwCQ9VhyKbwM2rRdXqtfCJWcq1S o665RPfH33ZnkytAjv26CUX4CRNeZcy2XxSuuom9Yy1ZDDp7FW78quCINv5tBypaDa60 h7+TZaTL+Md5X9sP2FkNWbk0KfUVt98T0e8r4= Received: by 10.67.115.1 with SMTP id s1mr1029660ugm.74.1212935337977; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.78? ( [84.68.62.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm899222ugc.87.2008.06.08.07.28.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <484BECA8.8020906@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:28:56 +0100 From: George User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 References: <3c32f69c0806041700h42cc5110y34400ec34184e77c@mail.gmail.com> <4847B354.6090800@gentoo.org> <4848915D.60809@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4848915D.60809@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2b61a698-6144-450b-aab3-f6f6c1570822 X-Archives-Hash: ea0b3ccc7e7449c4865396948ccaf5f8 > Richard Brown wrote: > > This was the first of many nominations for the incumbent council that > gave no reason as to why they should be voted for in this election, as > several of them have accepted their nominations with no further > qualification, and flameeyes seems to think himself above having to > justify why he should be elected, so I provide, for your > entertainment, the following blog posts: > > A Council of Successes: An attempt to analyze what the incumbent > council have achieved during their tenure. > http://arbearohooooen.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/a-council-of-successes/ > Any blog post that calls the Council "pussies" should automatically get classed under "drivel" Nice. -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list