From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxmRL-0000mo-Bp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:12:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F84DE05CA; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5A4E05CA for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so313586ugc.49 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 10:12:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=iq6AjdvwM57/tMYdf4wZmstO6lRktTL6TRdmIUawKmw=; b=MG8X0EdwXh0EZk/JxeDLitkZiSXKszXtgCebc2PtHc7dcHe5w7qFGHIj8wDKEqcaYs/6/o0TturIHmZXMIm25UgIujzVgbX9R0klBhZXKykm5Y4c6us7sBSLOx2uVN4GrMctX3Surcz8g/kgq+G+tYuH49VeZKMOaoV4kzP6Ojc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=HLPt8C9jVb7XfVnhprjDUHsCORI29q2JHX8chKsuBOVX4+q9Klb5WU9YtUS5DAhGJru6Bja2Wb7HbhBhDlM8JBb4hWJI4SLFtU9kl7QA79HfDg7imWFK64lTJUGa0TbDj3FDwyOvAOaABoUMCzSZKhxok4cKcZZ7rr/60+tpMR8= Received: by 10.67.29.4 with SMTP id g4mr2662583ugj.84.1211130771296; Sun, 18 May 2008 10:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiny-one.home ( [81.158.32.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm12898154gve.3.2008.05.18.10.12.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 18 May 2008 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:12:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080508233328.GA8896@comet> <20080518171851.51f7df3d@snowcone> <1211128694.5569.91.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> In-Reply-To: <1211128694.5569.91.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <48306390.05a4100a.0f52.1396@mx.google.com> X-Archives-Salt: 52bb7a74-0040-419f-a69f-ac1b94e88a11 X-Archives-Hash: 4216bee89d3dcc9f60a8672f6a42cb33 On Sunday 18 May 2008 16:26:00 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 16:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > For the zillionth time... GLEP 39 was not a GLEP. It was one of a > > collection of proposals (that were not GLEPs) that were voted upon by a > > global vote. It was then *later* made available in GLEP form by Grant > > for convenience, but it wasn't accepted as a GLEP. > > Ok, but where is it stated that changes, or amendments can only be > done/approved by a global vote? As it stands now, it clearly states > global issues are to be decided by the council. With no conditions or > stipulations. On Sunday 18 May 2008 17:38:14 William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Another very good point. IMHO the CoC falls under the GSC which the > trustees/foundation enforces not the council. So they topic at hand for > the current council is not of technical nature and thus should not be on > their plate. Which the subsequent meeting of a topic/subject that should > not fall to them. So is GLEP 39 within the Council's domain or not? It seems pretty non-technical to me, global issue or not. -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list