[gentoo-project] was any decision made?

[gentoo-project] was any decision made?

[George Prowse]

The munging or whatever it is called is still active.

I would still like reply=to to go to the list an not the person.

How likely is that going to happen? Gentoo-dev gets it right

Flame commence for the billionth time...

George
-- 
gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-project] was any decision made?

[Dale]

George Prowse wrote:
> The munging or whatever it is called is still active.
>
> I would still like reply=to to go to the list an not the person.
>
> How likely is that going to happen? Gentoo-dev gets it right
>
> Flame commence for the billionth time...
>
> George

So that's why there is very little discussion on here.  You reply to
only one person so everyone else assumes the discussion is over.  I been
wondering why there was so few replies.  Now I know.

+1 by the way. 

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)
-- 
gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-project] Re: was any decision made?

[Steve Long]

George Prowse wrote:

> The munging or whatever it is called is still active.
>
Still switched *off* you mean.

> I would still like reply=to to go to the list an not the person.
>
Sheesh, does your email client /still/ not get that right? Some of the
#gentoo-desktop bods were talking about this in evolution:
<johnny>        what's the deal with evo not allowing me to "reply to list"
<johnny>        it never shows up in the context menu
<tuXXX> johnny: and in the "Message" menu?
<johnny>        yes it is there, but no shortcut
<tuXXX> I have Ctrl+L
<johnny>        aha.. it's greyed out
<johnny>        yes, shortcut, but greyed out
<tuXXX> (but my evo is 2.21.1)
<tuXXX> It's greyed out for me on non-ML mails
<johnny>        aha.. i finally found a list that doesn't munge, thought some of
them were not doing it that were

(That last comment is interesting: it shows that many Gentoo users are only
just starting to learn that the lists are munged, and that this makes a
difference to the utility of a fully functional client.)

> How likely is that going to happen? Gentoo-dev gets it right
>
Gentoo dev mungs yes. Obviously we differ on whether that is the right thing
to do; I think it's totally appropriate for a novice user group, but a bit
lame for a dev m-l tbh.

> Flame commence for the billionth time...
> 
Ah well, you know my feeling on this; it's up to the user group I guess.


-- 
gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list