From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J3i8C-0006Ag-J1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:17:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBG1H6Go003989; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:17:06 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBG1H5OK003983 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:17:05 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1453580ugf.49 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:17:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=drJj4QLUFimBUS901Z40hQ0MJe2VI5SxrZXJWDs9IKM=; b=C/RRaSHlv9zaYAcDT3515XwpjRbtA6JXHiOAd3wieR4x36Rb23Eo6+c2MlJ+WM8qJ/KwiEtOiONnZqrjaqHKHmUHfRnhwDlACn4jqoaA0qXeBeeH3bBGdDtVwoJk3xwWgUlcSeZh578TH4bVU6HgG70nLL3jxL+infqt8pmTdDA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cgAxqrv7Wd7HdzjGQ9vfRNXnnkP9pEWi1Q0I4kcr8+rldZ6ILspVM45/zDUG4FRCHoX2yVl30i1gdkoRWlnA+7zh3QZnS86+bRpoNiIbhnBcVwfYTpv1kWzQJmlYFHly4+7LZ2nE2ENk8KWAXLu6Uz/tTqiH/4AycZ7VIRgEUj0= Received: by 10.67.88.10 with SMTP id q10mr1890228ugl.52.1197767824892; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.144? ( [81.79.80.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m1sm7308298uge.2007.12.15.17.17.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:17:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47647C86.6030109@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:16:54 +0000 From: George Prowse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Ciaran McCreesh , gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] PMS References: <1197736248l.20970l.1l@spike> <20071215164830.154e8016@blueyonder.co.uk> <7c612fc60712151218t31d83684md0e37df9aa0b8b36@mail.gmail.com> <20071215202845.3d6fffb6@blueyonder.co.uk> <47647827.4000602@gmail.com> <20071216010053.5cecbb48@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071216010053.5cecbb48@blueyonder.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d430dda9-6f46-4161-adaf-bf3db64e9384 X-Archives-Hash: 36bbdc593229279a45438c2aaf40577d Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:58:15 +0000 > George Prowse wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:18:08 +0100 >>> "Denis Dupeyron" wrote: >>>> On Dec 15, 2007 5:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >>>> wrote: >>>>> Incorrect. The Council has stated that once PMS has been accepted >>>>> [...] >>>> Which has yet to happen. >>> Well no. But that doesn't stop what Roy said from being utter >>> nonsense. >>> >> But which would hold more weight? > > Huh? > ok, lets put it in easy language... If a package manager that Gentoo uses happens to use ebuilds, right? And the main developer of another package manager thinks that it shouldn't be used for that reason then it would be logical to never use that PM for PACKAGE MANAGEMENT. Right? Actually, that would give pretty much anything weight over said PM. http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored -- gentoo-project@gentoo.org mailing list