From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE981382C5 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745BFE0984; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5305::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF17E0952 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 22:00:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1522360839; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=akhuettel.de; h=Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=vJmofO7qSmnRDrEjwtagZJygl1AsKLK7praf1/hzcnc=; b=E511NRqFaVrykvFgZUDkik3nE5QIe2MjnjDxKR2cfehSgaojEOOo+KiiBESwWvCF/+ wMbzsn+cICGvEbpeR0z92JTLXsw6Qb6ry8+atvhsnqGUhTsyuXhPGEeFfzONvuyIDwW2 waUGsX63J70JwQYNyTSUBa5gbGxKXU89GL6swhxv8RJajDY373gqMdkfd07t+o46Slz8 ymIif29tMVvIWQaJZOSsAtaz4mobJwTIkaJhyPc8rrN+H5oZx3aoehPBdHfMJ6t7zlX+ aWONbkQy5rhfKyY8diIN+Cgp+4NJ64WGz9KOehGhhtBkwXuxTofULiIrOLuE53oU9qRl Xc7g== X-RZG-AUTH: :OWINOFLlffDapcDBqFE7Zrd96KgtvCbCLT6AOrgenbpvKdiafvhmpwZI4lTehTN54uGYpEJFYUg= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (46-227-99-89.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [46.227.99.89]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 43.1 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id z0bf12u2TM0c4AG (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:00:38 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-04-08 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:00:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4713495.ng7VznPXfy@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: <1522330445.1006.21.camel@gentoo.org> References: <87muyt9njh.fsf@gentoo.org> <23228.52463.901357.194625@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1522330445.1006.21.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2152998.Ppa9KiEsHr"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 20350ad0-3b4e-4ee4-94e7-6c866b2a527a X-Archives-Hash: 09d044ed366af9178fc0536580dd6e44 --nextPart2152998.Ppa9KiEsHr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Am Donnerstag, 29. M=C3=A4rz 2018, 15:34:05 CEST schrieb Micha=C5=82 G=C3= =B3rny: >=20 > 1. Does deprecation really mean anything in terms of profiles? Even > in the context of EAPI bans we explicitly stated that it affects new > packages and EAPI bumps. I think deprecating it for ebuilds is still > meaningful even if profiles would stay EAPI 5. If we state that we deprecate *ebuilds* then it doesnt affect profiles. So it just depends on the wording. Having an EAPI deprecated for part of its impact is kinda messy though. >=20 > 2. Do we want to keep profiles EAPI 5 indefinitely? If we consider it > a goal to reduce the number of EAPIs in use, I think it would be > reasonable to bump profiles to EAPI 6 proactively, even if it doesn't > change anything. We can bump them, but very slowly... and best at release-like steps like 13= =2E0=20 =2D> 17.0.=20 If your portage doesn't understand some ebuilds, that's kinda half-safe for= a=20 transition time (it just won't see the updates).=20 If your portage doesn't understand your profile, that makes things explode= =20 much more efficiently. =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=C3=BCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) --nextPart2152998.Ppa9KiEsHr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEwo/LD3vtE3qssC2JpEzzc+fumeQFAlq9YgZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEMy OEZDQjBGN0JFRDEzN0FBQ0IwMkQ4OUE0NENGMzczRTdFRTk5RTQACgkQpEzzc+fu meRrCBAA0sgxYdoTC+YXSVvc9Tsi6vn8zqoIl90U82PwbVJFVmUka/RebmQTiOBB 4kqXkXzzXkUspsRfZ9J8Dnv45hc6l5Y9a6NieL2BPqh8zYYMy23z7DG1sbIDakSG hbriKnIeqH/rJeo6Y+ymYeuUPHB1nsX+cRGYeXofvqA6EE9/2FgYgeJ6Cj+BcVge jwB6Mt+sQihRwmb5jtRQrXzL3A/XDHk98hHmGSyaZl3JKjluJ44oxHecbTxL04Ue uQEcg5XO/iylqKqRuY8U4izTQw36wx0EK+b1pfPYv4OBEsex6bHIf53ljTJFpd9Y shOW8SHkG/sODJTHMQZqYzC8LHa0UcDS9QTrQC3UZ4xrH+OmoBwRSCFO8C7E1IXQ uPKI2/Ua6TKUwNcOMqEWrsGOMlrBgNbq8wF8e/eDs+oP0LAyDbXOGFvRBwKU1huh r0kIaD4svxaPqSNAN8Dlx6PZm2j5Wl8kQ9zL9Ck3dlNDt1MIs3B1MWPS8pee3gpS tU0jj2HzslsNtfC0CVH6Ldadoh4GMyB65fb2Bz05DW3SgoB/NqoRXyekjjOmFkcV gB7uMjjCF6+W6zo9s5J9eKtoCuXVzKqk0tLoQ5+0UUSTAjZsAQ/zRNIBE617gue8 l85Cb1OmtLxBWBz6ThBOj7M5gy9dO/3dld8ii6filTNDh2SnXxg= =QLSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2152998.Ppa9KiEsHr--