From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-project+bounces-222-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JElTV-0000Zh-FZ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:05:05 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A3EEE02FD;
	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A663E02FD
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so755021wra.1
        for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:05:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=+4UDnbacpRg+3K6v3pjulS3IIKWfbCSbQdBht3cOgZM=;
        b=LgTFXXFFOhKK9jfFrPj9VHjdFJpYxLaTpfOKomVdHA2M2rdR5BUvE6MT5HwLCZy4AoktgkGnLINJQGmfP6eridw0ovx8HEZHQ2D/OeiVia9/9MrYXmAgPkmbrGtrxwcFvNLkKZa25dCtuSDTEw0BfYYSUNXpcaYEdGK75vUb2lE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=E/HCehO98KvbQEg/GaH8+2WrpGH7MmA+ly6tP2BfvdHxk3x5C2djiNyH/PN2wgT/CXyVKleVcdG7VgdTnfj3AUyCJPo/hMWkRGMNhQJYgf0BjvwPhZX+3/rV5DNeER0AzXmpUHe5S/BCV8pkf3+NeCyBbh2cjPwuMIOY0JSOUac=
Received: by 10.150.191.10 with SMTP id o10mr2952774ybf.84.1200402303888;
        Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.124.6 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <42ebd5dc0801150505y4a355a7cx59d5ae178926d8f2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:05:03 +0100
From: "Dominik Riva" <slalomsk8er@gmail.com>
To: "Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] A proposal to get out of this mess
Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20080115125109.13145wo79hytzfis@www2.mailstation.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42ebd5dc0801141711m30bc22bv2721d86d81ae4990@mail.gmail.com>
	 <478C7044.2070402@gmail.com>
	 <42ebd5dc0801150131rd5d6134sbbb8bfa2bdc2c9bf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <478C8596.80005@gmail.com>
	 <42ebd5dc0801150329g785478a5h7c95500d1de1dda6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080115125109.13145wo79hytzfis@www2.mailstation.de>
X-Archives-Salt: 6cc57c38-414d-4eec-a9e0-c4e37452933e
X-Archives-Hash: 2e44f3266f9ae594b5b528225ade1a9f

On Jan 15, 2008 12:51 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <philantrop@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > And a Invitee to all devs to join the discussion in -core but I hope
> > this was done long ago.
>
> Rest assured that the discussion has been lively there.
>

Thant is a very good thing to hear.

> I don't get all the fuss about this, though. So the Foundation is in
> trouble, so what? It's basically holding the Gentoo trademark in the
> USA (in Europe, it does *not*, another legal entity does here) and it
> is the copyright holder of the ebuilds.

Maybe it is all about the "so what?" mentality of the core that led to
this mess in the first place?
I can understand that this angers the community and drobbins, as it
angers me too.

I am not the person to jump blindly on drobbins ultimatum bandwagon
with a lot of angry users on it.
But I think that some drastic actions must be taken, maybe exactly
because the bandwagon with the angry mob on it.

> The ebuilds keep coming, we're basically doing "business" as usual and
> that should be enough, I'd say.

Sure, all is fine in the land of Gentoo - problems are for people that
have nothing better to do :(


Regards, Dominik Riva
-- 
gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list