public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] What should the default acceptable licenses be?
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:56:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <417625d4-1741-254f-6417-a29c8e8e4bc0@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f33ab8-fb98-275d-cea0-7a9710bf9f8e@gentoo.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]

On 1/29/19 7:41 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 1/29/19 7:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Not depending on non-free software sounds nice in principle until you
>> start talking about all those little things that make physical
>> hardware actually work.  If it were a practical option I'd be all for
>> it.  Otherwise this is a choice that really only exists on paper.
> 
> This is a matter of documentation in the handbook, though.
> 
> e.g on my laptop (all of my systems have similar setups already) which
> has ACCEPT_LICENSE="-* @FREE -AGPL-3 -AGPL-3+ freedist ", the exception
> list still only are has
> # cat /etc/portage/package.license/*|wc -l
> 21
> ... of which 4 entries are related to AGPL and as such wouldn't really
> be relevant for the proposed change. and that is a full desktop (laptop)

...and actually has a bit of cruft due to experimenting with
hardware/drivers and apps I didn't ultimately end up using...


-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-26 21:04 [gentoo-project] What should the default acceptable licenses be? Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-01-26 21:32 ` [gentoo-project] " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2019-01-27  9:47   ` Ulrich Mueller
2019-01-26 21:45 ` Thomas Deutschmann
2019-01-26 22:12 ` [gentoo-project] " Michał Górny
2019-01-26 22:51 ` Rich Freeman
2019-01-27  1:25   ` Alec Warner
2019-01-28 22:27   ` Matt Turner
2019-01-29 16:54     ` Thomas Deutschmann
2019-01-29 17:28       ` Brian Evans
2019-02-05 20:03         ` Roy Bamford
2019-01-29 17:53       ` Alec Warner
2019-01-29 18:27         ` Rich Freeman
2019-01-29 18:41           ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-01-29 18:56             ` Kristian Fiskerstrand [this message]
2019-01-30  0:12               ` Thomas Deutschmann
2019-01-30  0:35                 ` Alec Warner
2019-01-29 17:53       ` Rich Freeman
2019-01-31 16:53       ` Matt Turner
2019-02-05 23:47 ` [gentoo-project] " Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-12 19:40   ` Alec Warner
2019-02-13  9:34     ` Thomas Deutschmann
2019-02-13  9:50       ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2019-02-13 10:44       ` Ulrich Mueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=417625d4-1741-254f-6417-a29c8e8e4bc0@gentoo.org \
    --to=k_f@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=rich0@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox