From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65609139694 for ; Fri, 12 May 2017 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0007E0C56; Fri, 12 May 2017 10:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5305::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4F5E0C39 for ; Fri, 12 May 2017 10:41:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1494585708; l=1410; s=domk; d=akhuettel.de; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=wiTcW0AoBuJg+cqQ9JDAn/B5uEEiImoCbPWGTjc4Ym4=; b=VsMYrmwfOgk0bNi5668snzcbpkT6xNL0W7g5oREKTAXLjTwq76jb+nMAwKS1R3VOi6 TZbm+/f/5DAlORE9mlY+6Ftaq8iRWtSB5TChEq7oFqkkgd9tRjTDgeHw9EfUJiTVjazU wkFY5fV5n2K2qqT1IeUiUzGW1O8GI1JGamjUg= X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/p6KPKBAtzqB9G7/NQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (tmo-104-43.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.104.43]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 40.6 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id a0bcf5t4CAfjBmf (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Fri, 12 May 2017 12:41:45 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14 Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 12:41:56 +0200 Message-ID: <41531669.sqmABNDIxN@porto> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: 37078ded-1181-4ab0-82c4-ff520e43ff87 X-Archives-Hash: 302d333ee4f1a095e03e894dfeee52ef Am Freitag, 12. Mai 2017, 10:52:01 CEST schrieb Roy Bamford: > On 2017.05.12 00:07, Daniel Campbell wrote: > [snip] >=20 > > I'd be open to a trial -- try it out for a few months and see what > > happens. I have a feeling I'll be right and activity will plummet, but > > the only way to know for sure is to try it. Then nobody can argue over > > it because we'll have facts to work with. > >=20 > > Just my 2=A2. >=20 > Its been tried and and was judged a failure by a past council. >=20 And the number of people who are still around from back then is not that bi= g=20 anymore. In addition, if you are going to cite prehistory (roughly 9 years ago) here= ,=20 let me correct you... (1) * The proctors team was indeed considered a failure and disbanded back then= ;=20 in my opinion that went rather idiotically, with lots of egos clashing. * The council back then agreed that=20 -> gentoo-dev should be moderated for non-@gentoo adresses -> gentoo-project should be created to attract all the bikeshedding interpersonal flamebaits ... Thus gentoo-project came into being. And suddenly it was so quiet on gentoo- dev that the moderation proposal seemed unnecessary... (1) As you know I've been reading the logs and at least part of the archive= d=20 mail.=20 =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)