public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Huber <johu@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:42:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4147058.c9JUSjB66t@elia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kKjMLV22BRZFOqoafFRKoh2y+S72+efMQ2aWK6zuhrZw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1290 bytes --]

Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 08:08:53 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
> 
> <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Is Gentoo really a loose association of individualists who care about
> > nothing but their own stuff, and give a $(/%& about users or the
> > distribution as a whole?
> > 
> > Because that's the impression I recently get on the mailing list, and I'm
> > not really sure if it's worthwhile putting any more effort into it then.
> Some may say so, but the reality is that it has always been a united
> effort - just not one in which everybody has a mailstop.
> 
> Honestly, I've only seen 2-3 devs really digging in their feet over
> systemd units, and that isn't going to cause a total meltdown.  It
> seems like the general problem of over possessive maintainers is more
> widespread.  That manifests itself in a million papercuts that tend to
> drive individuals nuts but we've generally weathered them.  I think
> the solution there is a functioning devrel or other disciplinary body
> with a faster time constant but lower amplitude.
> 
> Rich

100 points for you to put the word systemd into the thread. Could we just stop 
to take over on every thread?

-- 
Johannes Huber (johu)
Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team
GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-15 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-15 11:50 [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 11:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2013-06-15 12:15   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 21:43     ` Michael Weber
2013-06-16  4:20     ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16  6:31     ` Sergey Popov
2013-06-16  9:33       ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-15 12:08 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-15 12:42   ` Johannes Huber [this message]
2013-06-15 13:44     ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 14:19       ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 16:08         ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 13:30 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-15 16:08   ` Roy Bamford
2013-06-15 20:00     ` William Hubbs
2013-06-15 20:14       ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-17 16:15 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-06-17 17:02   ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-06-17 18:24     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4147058.c9JUSjB66t@elia \
    --to=johu@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox