From: Johannes Huber <johu@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:19:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3792296.R0cMAdYMWg@elia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130615154410.24c3c4a8@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1669 bytes --]
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 15:44:10 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:42:49 +0200
>
> Johannes Huber <johu@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 08:08:53 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
> > >
> > > <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > Is Gentoo really a loose association of individualists who care
> > > > about nothing but their own stuff, and give a $(/%& about users
> > > > or the distribution as a whole?
> > > >
> > > > Because that's the impression I recently get on the mailing list,
> > > > and I'm not really sure if it's worthwhile putting any more
> > > > effort into it then.
> > >
> > > Some may say so, but the reality is that it has always been a united
> > > effort - just not one in which everybody has a mailstop.
> > >
> > > Honestly, I've only seen 2-3 devs really digging in their feet over
> > > systemd units, and that isn't going to cause a total meltdown. It
> > > seems like the general problem of over possessive maintainers is
> > > more widespread. That manifests itself in a million papercuts that
> > > tend to drive individuals nuts but we've generally weathered them.
> > > I think the solution there is a functioning devrel or other
> > > disciplinary body with a faster time constant but lower amplitude.
> > >
> > > Rich
> >
> > 100 points for you to put the word systemd into the thread. Could we
> > just stop to take over on every thread?
>
> Can we stop assuming this is a "take over" of a thread? It's an example.
Not assuming, proofed on -dev ml a lot. Thanks.
--
Johannes Huber (johu)
Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team
GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-15 11:50 [gentoo-project] Gentoo as a team effort Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 11:54 ` Fabian Groffen
2013-06-15 12:15 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-06-15 21:43 ` Michael Weber
2013-06-16 4:20 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2013-06-16 6:31 ` Sergey Popov
2013-06-16 9:33 ` Douglas Dunn
2013-06-15 12:08 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-15 12:42 ` Johannes Huber
2013-06-15 13:44 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 14:19 ` Johannes Huber [this message]
2013-06-15 16:08 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-06-15 13:30 ` Markos Chandras
2013-06-15 16:08 ` Roy Bamford
2013-06-15 20:00 ` William Hubbs
2013-06-15 20:14 ` Rich Freeman
2013-06-17 16:15 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-06-17 17:02 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-06-17 18:24 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3792296.R0cMAdYMWg@elia \
--to=johu@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox