From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8A1139085 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D939721C112; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E93221C09C for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id a10so73868631ywa.3 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:49:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKF+iBqu/sRY14rNVePXjsr2I6R5KbAt58sZEATl0vA=; b=vGEEVQWRL3gvMH5HyDi7Xt4ak1Vp3bVB9NOrvmjxKCB2HfD25OtONZ4eUusuQ0uksa Zc4Uvkwz6ivNlzF8V6c14zWrZLw1BPCEmP2wfaLNeznJ1sgMQV/HRHsINZcMNsNGmAmt M7J1DPrmTvQUrqssQBoOSukAdrhVdyNJFn/OxRdwhjWJ+cOjqD1hFmGkxRAdCHUmHGl8 vdMIq/i9WCzjtjGuvunuz4DKU2UBQSJ21/IW2zw/YjkV5L7VqWz/nprYm1YuF6fatILu YIO5EVK+glr5zoAskY929EhU9v0L4Ui2zN+ZDgyzO2ULG9ZKAEc0BJHWKyi03MJmXPzt cl2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKF+iBqu/sRY14rNVePXjsr2I6R5KbAt58sZEATl0vA=; b=tNZzIj9H4YkOjf9ue9bIDOtsCWMyg2d/7vfD7iesnhI9SrELhF9lGtrYeHzmRN0Kfr 4IZSttsIcZrAwQOygqnNriaYLxQlAZ5s7ioBj8ucclZ3Lk+xKYvtZKyvoHUxvKEbz1+N t+NJ14DAX0lORvWaBIEvbTNW/Lj+lRWKvUnQZ97/aZKUb6xqFEAMigKDm1y57XVc7MSs sdSTL7NSCVWH+cKI1NfXazXDG/EdSACQeTs2O8vqiOGoevPbNPqpcdvZfUQiBDCByrzo QszP/nv7jnijuaWTY2tU+wigcddTf6K8Rs7aG1WfO4Kyjfa29sBdcTDJbsedDGrOphPi qVhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJEAoG2y1IazwOhDVfAB454rLkoD17vqSNDNqp0op7mORk5cVX3KZuGEXO0lF0vxA== X-Received: by 10.129.179.132 with SMTP id r126mr19162807ywh.70.1484592555061; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-121-9.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.121.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm10150422ywj.4.2017.01.16.10.49.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:49:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <1604622.bZRWYHrp25@pinacolada> <61ec354b-5dea-f61c-bcce-64be6affeca6@gentoo.org> From: Dale Message-ID: <3602b79b-10aa-a6ce-644b-e9fdc726f09d@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:49:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <61ec354b-5dea-f61c-bcce-64be6affeca6@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5f620cab-e0a4-4a2c-ade0-0e88b8195d91 X-Archives-Hash: eb6365c69b3b10fc2367e0ba810ecaa4 Matthew Thode wrote: > On 01/16/2017 12:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >>> I agree with William here. >>> >>> The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. >> Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. >> >>> Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its >>> something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the >>> Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) >>> >> Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the >> Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach >> out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the >> Trustees. >> > I'd like one done, but I don't have the time :( Luckily Alec was > voluntold to do it :D > I'm glad someone is. From what I am reading, I don't think SPI does all that some think it does. It would be best to ask first and then operate from that. I think Alec will ask some good questions and maybe even ask about some hypothetical situations. Dale :-) :-)