public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Poll: Would you sign a Contributer License Agreement?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 20:53:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23312.17561.642999.648549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48f52987-8fe7-9d07-34f8-48a189cb39f3@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1952 bytes --]

>>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018, kuzetsa  wrote:

> On 05/30/2018 01:45 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> I have a nit question:
>> Can we please call the agreement "FLA" instead of "CLA", since it is
>> derived from FSFE's FLA-2.0, and is still a FLA at it's heart, rather
>> than a USian-centric CLA?

> ^ That's not a 'nit question, it's a big deal!!!

> After researching the FSFE-style "FLA", it's important:

> https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/fla.en.html (FAQ of sorts)

> Q) What if trustee misuses the rights I gave to them, e.g.
> by re-licensing Free Software as a proprietary one?

> A) FLA offers a special clause for this kind of situation
> to protect the Free Software project against potentially
> malicious intentions of Trustee. According to this
> provision, if Trustee acts against the principles of Free
> Software, all granted rights and licences return to their
> original owners. That means Trustee will be effectively
> prevented from continuing any activity which is contrary
> to principles of Free Software.

> ~(end quote of FAQ, etc)~

> That is to say: in the past, I've refused to contribute
> when asked for a generic copyright assignment, especially
> when more "permissive" (not as libre / free) licenses were
> already causing me to heistate.

> If it's a generic "assign all copyrights", then no.
> I would not sign a copyright assignment which doesn't
> look after my intent to work on libre / free-type works.

> yes please. do it as FLA if possible. ::thumbs up::

As I said before, the FSFE has asked us not to name it FLA even with
our relatively small changes applied. That's why its title is "Gentoo
Contributor License Agreement". Otherwise, it is derived from FLA-2.0
and (IMHO) preserves all its main features.

If you still think it should better be named FLA, feel free to take it
up with the FSFE legal team (legal@lists.fsfe.org). I don't feel like
going through more hassle just because of the title.

Ulrich

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-31 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-30 14:36 [gentoo-project] Poll: Would you sign a Contributer License Agreement? Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-30 17:45 ` Robin H. Johnson
2018-05-30 18:56   ` Rich Freeman
2018-05-30 22:02     ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-31  5:48   ` kuzetsa
2018-05-31 18:53     ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
     [not found] ` <20180530182136.GB18004@kroah.com>
2018-05-30 21:44   ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-30 22:31     ` Rich Freeman
2018-05-30 22:44       ` Ulrich Mueller
     [not found]     ` <20180531070321.GC7744@kroah.com>
2018-05-31  9:34       ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-31 10:18       ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-31 10:23         ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-05-31 22:24     ` Jonas Stein
2018-05-31 22:27       ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-05-31 23:52         ` Raymond Jennings
2018-06-01  1:55           ` R0b0t1
2018-06-01  2:32             ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-01 11:49               ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-01  1:52       ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-04 12:35 ` [gentoo-project] " Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-04 12:44   ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
     [not found]   ` <20180625013334.GA28404@kroah.com>
2018-06-25  6:50     ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-core] " Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-25  7:02       ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
     [not found]       ` <20180625070525.GA6151@kroah.com>
2018-06-25  7:54         ` Ulrich Mueller
     [not found]           ` <20180625110540.GB3058@kroah.com>
2018-06-25 14:08             ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-25 14:37             ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-25 14:46               ` M. J. Everitt
2018-06-25 14:56                 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-25 15:53                   ` Denis Dupeyron
2018-06-25 16:50                     ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-25 19:02                       ` Denis Dupeyron
2018-06-25 20:13                         ` Michał Górny
2018-06-25 20:28                           ` Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
2018-06-25 20:33                           ` Denis Dupeyron
2018-06-25 20:31                     ` Alec Warner
2018-06-25 20:52                       ` Denis Dupeyron
2018-06-25 21:06                         ` Alec Warner
2018-06-25 21:06                         ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-25 22:10                           ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-25 23:55                     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-06-25 16:54                 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-25 17:10                   ` M. J. Everitt
2018-06-25 17:37                     ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-09  9:02 ` [gentoo-project] " Ulrich Mueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23312.17561.642999.648549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
    --to=ulm@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox