From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C7F139694 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBBFEE0C32; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kph.uni-mainz.de (mail.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.132.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C602E0C31 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate-1.kph.uni-mainz.de (mailgate-1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.132.27]) by mail.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1RH9XQM020250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by mailgate-1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1RH9P6B028866; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v1RH9FQ2007273; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:15 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id v1RH9ALl007265; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:10 +0100 Message-ID: <22708.23857.361443.820405@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:05 +0100 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items, council meeting Mar 12 In-Reply-To: <20170227160544.GA23003@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> References: <20170227160544.GA23003@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+yKdaN8feMSwpKfV"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mailgate-1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.132.27]); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:09:31 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mailgate-1.kph.uni-mainz.de X-Archives-Salt: cc524920-8cad-489c-942e-c0119a809a05 X-Archives-Hash: d02344ec70d5822f69afd9cf7c66932e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+yKdaN8feMSwpKfV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, William Hubbs wrote: > the Gentoo council will meet again on March 12 at 19:00 utc in the > #gentoo-council channel on freenode. > Please respond to this message with any items you would like us to > add to the agenda to vote on or discuss. In the 2014-10-14 meeting, there was the following decision under the "Git Migration Issues" topic: Can we drop CVS headers post-migration? Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge, radhermit, rich0, williamh This was again briefly discussed in the 2016-04-10 meeting (following a discussion in the gentoo-dev mailing list) and in the 2016-11-13 meeting (with respect to a repoman check for the ebuild header). Since there appear to be doubts how to interpret above mentioned decision, I would like to ask the Council to clarify the following points: a) Are $Id$ and $Header$ lines to be removed in the gentoo repository? b) Does this only apply to ebuilds and eclasses, or also to other files in the tree, e.g., metadata, profiles, and files in FILESDIR other than patches (like init scripts)? c) Should these lines be removed in one go, or should we enable a repoman check and have them fade out over time? d) Should git expansion of $Id$ be enabled (i.e., ident in git attributes)? Ulrich --pgp+signed+yKdaN8feMSwpKfV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYtF0UAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJznbYIAMvl1XAYabC++/tZxdWKs6Ys E9c7EHFh4sBEZTRiYsKprPbFvBYDF5LvKt9af8paKA2AnWRiwnntPK6v7Irz1ueA S0FYUbxczOzUZjfvYC+7vFZmUFx86CD+hGCJGExjNa1dfRTNqCBTmYZiB3bFmeeT w3+TEsI7L2fMS9+HelB9N9GKxelyOEOiixRJIbACtLNcd6c228FRhynOEPe8eiC0 Z/a8ZfUTQjU9K+h0PsCZ84I5K4WVFdsch6GcdBI446SK6YkNSRfJqIIXfSws+PxQ 1HHIm5dmUHoA6+zIzflnS/EYNumu4GKqCSqdf+X0UB4M12p4yBwqArza6P2vn0M= =BcD0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+yKdaN8feMSwpKfV--