From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8B51384A7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1FA8E0818; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D52DE0804 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t8UK5RBY001100; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:05:27 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t8UK5HV3029766; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:05:22 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id t8UK5Ce5029760; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <22028.16503.972899.216053@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:05:11 +0200 To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_G=F3rny?= Cc: "Andreas K. Huettel" , , Gentoo Council Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 In-Reply-To: <20150930214729.2fbc711b.mgorny@gentoo.org> References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <20150930201537.1d79253a.mgorny@gentoo.org> <22028.13209.67385.725488@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20150930212245.116c02dd.mgorny@gentoo.org> <22028.14943.239056.65194@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20150930214729.2fbc711b.mgorny@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp+signed+Ulxpi4UW3psivZL"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a7b5559b-a6d1-4b09-9bbd-fc7482745728 X-Archives-Hash: 8f782e78107babac9127874a3ed52a51 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --pgp+signed+Ulxpi4UW3psivZL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Micha=B3 G=F3rny wrote: >> We would need a "shortname" or "id" field in the project page >> template, e.g. "Quality Assurance" -> "qa" (but I guess most would >> be trivial, like "Emacs" -> "emacs"). I've already discussed this >> with a3li some time ago, and there should be no technical problems. > And what's the technical problem of using e-mail address instead > which is already there and is a valid global identifier=3F Why do we > have to duplicate more information when we can use something we need > there anyway=3F Because the mapping from projects to e-mail addresses is neither injective nor surjective. Ulrich --pgp+signed+Ulxpi4UW3psivZL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWDEBzAAoJEMMJBoUcYcJz8OkH/R8gNLajfjF2sYKg9c6i0JK6 iQpRwpO8AFpn6pEKeDNC2HsTWubGh0Am33HQZUvOS2W9/UIErsMhQjrhGe4MclOG Y5a5/mT5uQleIqwlD5WCY5fOt+XuVXjjiiazfCI1e6GrdTlG/kry+jt0kp7VYdWn 7+aWZbUDT6H5bcNNIA31nhBujabFiTfGt/Bi3R2wU8XvNK1p9U38PuL4LN81WjgZ mcc5OcrLS+X2JeUHo8DTYmCV7KdiNjCbsLkrAtKsXseHkpGRbhH4ehpUjFNUyTyf 7iasPSriXeMEfat2H6/+GemSNLrFJb+j8ZnonorOLO6TSuoTFkE/75nzw8nl3ko= =GG8s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp+signed+Ulxpi4UW3psivZL--