Re: [gentoo-project] Status update of Sunrise project?

[Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>]

On Sunday 12 April 2015 11:59:09 hasufell wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 01:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > 1.  What does proxy-maintainers lack in comparison to sunrise
> > exclusively.  The immediate question is whether sunrise should be
> > migrated to proxy-maintainers, so this specific comparison is
> > important.
> 
> proxy-maintainers lack:
> 1. a repository with a usable VCS
> 2. an actual review workflow... @proxy-maintainers are just some sort of
> backup committers. it's not a hub for contributors to gather, discuss,
> get reviews and improve skills
> 3. means to ensure the tree doesn't break
> 4. actively look for and educate potential developers, even before the
> recruitment process

Oh my. 

Can you please stop being such a drama queen and accept reality every now and 
then?


 
> So it should, if at all, be the other way around: dissolve
> proxy-maintainers, fix the sunrise workflow and make it the contribution
> hub again it once was. But I'm not actually advocating for that. I think
> the sunrise concept doesn't work anymore.

proxy-maint is the least broken process we have. Unless you have constructive 
criticism I don't see why you waste time whining about everything.
 
Sigh.