From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5905513855B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33EC1E0A01; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD58E095D for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r9TMFjPN023303 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:45 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9TMFjXw015677; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:45 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9TMFjgp015676; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:45 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <21104.13201.654027.432888@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:45 +0100 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization (Was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-11-12) In-Reply-To: <201310292255.04913.dilfridge@gentoo.org> References: <1701685.NthhqudeZE@kailua> <201310292255.04913.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: 5f54ff0f-8607-44cf-9cfe-8d6b8b2d2c46 X-Archives-Hash: 459c88883079dca3dd04d3ed184f49ef >>>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Andreas K Huettel wrote: > If you look at our metastructure page, it's a bit of a mess. Some > careful rearrangement might make sense... How about this: > 1) top level project "Gentoo Programming Resources" > - title in table is wrong, should be (according to project page) > "Gentoo Resources for Programming Languages", or just "Programming > Languages" > - has subprojects ada, haskell, ruby > proposed action: move java, lisp, perl, php, python in there as > additional subprojects GLEP 39 defines a project as "a group of developers working towards a goal". I don't see what we would gain by collecting several unrelated projects under an umbrella TLP. Are there any resources that can be shared, or is there a large overlap between devs working in the different language projects? In short, what problem are you trying to solve? > 2) top level project "Community Resources" > - has subprojects ComRel, Recruiters, Undertakers > proposed action: move PR, gse(dead?), Ops in there as additional > subprojects > 3) propsed action: create top level project "server" (in analogy to > "desktop") > move apache, kolab(dead?), scire, virtualization, vps, web-apps in > there as subprojects Same arguments as above. Ulrich