From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization (Was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-11-12)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:15:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21104.13201.654027.432888@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201310292255.04913.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
> If you look at our metastructure page, it's a bit of a mess. Some
> careful rearrangement might make sense... How about this:
> 1) top level project "Gentoo Programming Resources"
> - title in table is wrong, should be (according to project page)
> "Gentoo Resources for Programming Languages", or just "Programming
> Languages"
> - has subprojects ada, haskell, ruby
> proposed action: move java, lisp, perl, php, python in there as
> additional subprojects
GLEP 39 defines a project as "a group of developers working towards a
goal".
I don't see what we would gain by collecting several unrelated
projects under an umbrella TLP. Are there any resources that can be
shared, or is there a large overlap between devs working in the
different language projects? In short, what problem are you trying to
solve?
> 2) top level project "Community Resources"
> - has subprojects ComRel, Recruiters, Undertakers
> proposed action: move PR, gse(dead?), Ops in there as additional
> subprojects
> 3) propsed action: create top level project "server" (in analogy to
> "desktop")
> move apache, kolab(dead?), scire, virtualization, vps, web-apps in
> there as subprojects
Same arguments as above.
Ulrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1701685.NthhqudeZE@kailua>
2013-10-29 21:50 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: Dead projects (was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-11-12) Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-29 21:55 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization (Was: " Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-29 22:15 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2013-10-29 22:48 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-30 6:46 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization Ulrich Mueller
2013-10-30 7:36 ` Rich Freeman
2013-10-30 13:00 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2013-10-30 0:33 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items - pgp key handling Patrick Lauer
2013-10-30 5:35 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-10-30 5:55 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21104.13201.654027.432888@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox