From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2561381F3 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A67FE08C0; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9C9E081B for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1www.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r5HKAitd015155 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:10:44 +0200 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.6/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r5HKAheW014604; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:10:43 +0200 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r5HKAhOg014602; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:10:43 +0200 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20927.27971.609030.30061@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:10:43 +0200 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questioning/Interviewing council nominees In-Reply-To: References: <51BF4809.2020201@gentoo.org> <1371493020.2765.0@bluebottle> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller X-Archives-Salt: ba949393-f69e-44d8-9997-24296c6213ec X-Archives-Hash: 2e0ca8b0a758362e668a575c6e0e5083 >>>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Rich Freeman wrote: > Why not do it this way: We set up one thread (easily filtered for > those who wish to do so) with the Subject "Questions for > Candidates." Anybody who cares can pose a question with context if > you must (questions preferred over speeches). Then let candidates > just edit their manifestos addressing whatever questions they care > to answer. If somebody has a neurotic need to keep their personal > version of the score by all means post a table somewhere and > announce it once, but we don't need a running commentary - this > isn't politico. This won't work, because not all candidates will have a manifesto. Ulrich