public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" <contact@hacktivis.me>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Triumvirate in Gentoo
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:41:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604124140.GA25629@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31f6f5b574e0818a8fca3549e696ea18793c22ab.camel@gentoo.org>

[2020-06-04 09:15:37+0200] Michał Górny:
> All that said, I'd propose to meet in the middle -- following
> the ancient tradition, establish a triumvirate in Gentoo.  It would be:
> 
> 1. Technical lead -- a person with exceptional technical talents that
> would build the vision of Gentoo from technical perspective, i.e. make
> a distribution that people would love using.  Initially, this role could
> be taken by the QA lead.
> 
> 2. Social lead -- a person with exceptional social skills that would
> build the vision of Gentoo from community perspective, i.e. make
> a distribution that people would love contributing to.  Initially, this
> role would taken by the ComRel lead.
> 
> 3. Organization lead -- a person with (exceptional) business skills that
> would take care of all the financial and organizational aspects of
> Gentoo, i.e. make a distribution that sustains.  Initially, this role
> would be taken by the Foundation president.
> 
> Three seems to be a very good number -- on one hand, it's more than one,
> so the others can stop any single one from getting absolute power.
> On the other, it's small enough for them to be able to actively work
> together and directly establish a common set of goals (i.e. via
> an agreement rather than a majority vote).
> 
> 
> WDYT?

Sounds quite interesting, would they also have elections like other 
bodies in gentoo?
This way we do not end up with three dictators / immortals.

And I think there should maybe be two per lead, it's still very easy 
to reach consensus at 6 but it avoids getting to single-handed decisions,
specially when something only actually concerns one viewpoint/skill.

Best regards,


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04  7:15 [gentoo-project] [RFC] Triumvirate in Gentoo Michał Górny
2020-06-04 12:41 ` Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier [this message]
2020-06-04 12:54   ` Michał Górny
2020-06-04 13:12 ` Rich Freeman
2020-06-04 13:16   ` Joonas Niilola
2020-06-04 15:01     ` Brian Dolbec
2020-06-04 15:20       ` Michał Górny
2020-06-04 15:19   ` Michał Górny
2020-06-04 16:08     ` Rich Freeman
2020-06-04 17:32 ` Adam Feldman
2020-06-04 19:49   ` Michał Górny
2020-06-04 20:35     ` Adam Feldman
2020-06-09 11:53   ` Lars Wendler
2020-06-04 19:01 ` Aaron Bauman
2020-06-04 19:47   ` Michał Górny
2020-06-04 20:15     ` Aaron Bauman
2020-06-05  1:55 ` Alec Warner
2020-06-05  5:16 ` Michał Górny
2020-06-05  7:53   ` Ulrich Mueller
2020-06-07 12:44   ` Stefan Strogin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200604124140.GA25629@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org \
    --to=contact@hacktivis.me \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox