From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDF0138350 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1483FE093A; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD01DE0907 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux1.home (cpe-70-124-168-176.austin.res.rr.com [70.124.168.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EBB634E1FD; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 6706 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:10:28 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: comrel@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: comrel changes Message-ID: <20200217181028.GA6607@linux1.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, comrel@gentoo.org References: <20200217161812.GA5969@linux1.home> <709a8fe35d05180e4e8883fc973f285b383ef5fc.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <709a8fe35d05180e4e8883fc973f285b383ef5fc.camel@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 6a0ccea0-610c-456d-998f-9098e1c93af9 X-Archives-Hash: 8d30b378a7c273e41799c59940491ba0 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 10:18 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > Since comrel is a special TLP like QA, I think the comrel lead, like > > the qa lead, should be confirmed by the council. > >=20 >=20 > You may also want to have a GLEP for ComRel like GLEP 48 is for QA. This is a good idea; I will write one. =2E.. > > To promote more transparency with comrel, I would like to=20 > > require the comrel lead to send a report to the gentoo-project list mon= thly > > containing these statistics for the previous month: > >=20 > > - number of bugs received > > - number of bugs pending (this is for bugs that are currently in proces= s) > > - number of bugs resolved by actions (such as talking to > > developers or disciplinary action) > > - number of bugs closed without action >=20 > Not sure if you wouldn't need more split, e.g. between requests rejected > as invalid, withdrawn or timed out. There's not a timed out or invalid status for comrel that I'm aware of, but withdrawn might be good. I will encorporate that into the glep also. William --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXkrXDQAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OHGBAJ40cC4J30La0GZtCbE29it2MkzO4ACgsktksyvf4iuRkzeOo0/WQr3dSRg= =BURG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--